| americaunraveling.com |
| America Unraveling |
Children – Part One
First comes love.
Then comes marriage.
Then comes baby in the baby carriage. . .
(Scott E. Hastings documented the KISSING song in his book Miss Mary Mack All Dressed in Black, in the northern part of Vermont back in the 30s, mudcat.org: Folklore: Origin of skipping rhyme – K-I-S-S-I-N-G)
“Each day of our lives, we make deposits in the memory banks of our children.” – Charles R. Swindoll.
“We may not be able to prepare the future for our children, but we can at least prepare our children for the future.” – Franklin D. Roosevelt.
Pexels.com-rdne-8083811.jpg
Introduction – Emphasizing Responsibility in Raising Children.
The ethical responsibility of nurturing children extends beyond mere care; it requires a conscious commitment to guiding them toward a positive future, as highlighted by the biblical teachings in Luke 17:1-3, which emphasize the serious consequences of leading the young astray and the vital role adults play in shaping the promise of tomorrow. The second post of this Blog proclaimed that Satan is the instigator behind the manipulations that are unraveling America. America’s children are being manipulated and influenced because he wants its citizens to abandon the foundations supporting gender and sexuality established by God.
Focus – Raising Awareness About Parenting Challenges
One of the main areas that Satan targets is the upbringing of our children. The increasing influence of societal norms, social media, and peer pressure poses significant challenges for parents today. These factors threaten the psychological and emotional development of young people and signal a troubling decline in the historical support that America has provided to its children, particularly regarding issues related to gender and sexuality.
Gender and Sexuality
Gender is often regarded as a social construct, that arises from human interaction rather than existing in an objective reality where universal truths apply to all. Two genders have long been foundational to society, science, culture, and religion. However, competing philosophies are increasingly gaining acceptance, particularly within the social sciences. This includes various academic disciplines such as anthropology, archaeology, economics, geography, history, linguistics, psychology, and political science. At its core, gender involves the roles and expectations that society assigns to individuals based on their identification as male or female and today’s faulty assumption of a non-binary classification.
The concept of additional gender classifications is contrary to the belief that God created male and female distinctions. This raises the question of how the truth described in Scripture can coexist with viewing gender as a social construct. The answer is “it should not”.
In American culture, gender identity claims to reflect an individual’s self-understanding and can include traditional categories alongside non-binary and genderqueer identities. Gender expression pertains to how individuals present their gender through clothing and behavior, shaped by societal norms. This complexity leads to dilemmas regarding multiple genders and differing beliefs about the human experience.
Sexuality encompasses both sexual orientation, the emotional attraction to others, and gender identity. God identifies gender as either male or female. In our society, individuals try to manipulate this principle by claiming they can determine their gender (I have read that there are claims of at least 82 genders ). From a religious standpoint, sexuality serves two key purposes: ensuring human reproduction and nurturing deep connections between spouses. Embracing sexuality appropriately deepens intimacy with God, while misuse can undermine that relationship.
Consider and Scrutinize The Data
It is imperative that we undertake a thorough examination and careful analysis of the data at hand. There are individuals who are drawn towards evolving scientific interpretations concerning gender, sexuality, and child-rearing practices. While these interpretations can often lead to progressive discussions, they may also be rooted in misconceptions or lack a firm empirical foundation.
As society becomes increasingly accepting of a broader spectrum of sexual identities and expressions, this cultural shift presents considerable challenges to traditional values that have long governed family and community structures. Critics contend that conventional principles no longer sufficiently cater to the complex needs and interests of our rapidly evolving society, suggesting that these frameworks may hinder the progress toward inclusivity and understanding.
In light of these discussions, some individuals advocate for a return to what they perceive as God-given, binary genders of male and female. They argue that reinstating these traditional definitions could provide clarity and stability in an era marked by considerable change and uncertainty regarding identity and familial roles. This perspective highlights a tension between preserving established norms and adapting to an increasingly pluralistic society. I vote for the established norms.
Considering Gender Dysphoria
God’s love encompasses all children. The media often highlights the myriad challenges faced by young individuals navigating the complexities of gender dysphoria, igniting passionate discussions rooted in the scientific inquiry surrounding this multifaceted issue. But what motivates this heightened focus? Gaining insight into the intricate and often painful experiences of these children is essential, as many find themselves caught in a profound chasm between their innermost gender identity and the sex they were assigned at birth. This inner turmoil can usher in a wave of emotional and psychological distress, manifesting as confusion, anxiety, and isolation.
Moreover, the diverse opinions within the scientific community regarding the most effective methods to support these children—ranging from social transition to medical intervention—layer the ongoing discourse with misconceptions and stigma that can be harmful. As the conversation unfolds, it becomes increasingly crucial to approach this sensitive topic with empathy and understanding, recognizing the unique journeys that each child undertakes in their quest for acceptance and authenticity.
Exploring Gender Identity Complexities.
In our intricate and varied world, the investigation of identity—especially concerning gender—reveals a complicated and misleading portrayal filled with true and false nuances and complexities. For many individuals, the challenge arises from a profound disconnection between their self-perception and the roles, expectations, and stereotypes that society places upon them due to false gender classifications. This dissonance frequently results in considerable internal strife and emotional turmoil, sparking a desire for more profound insight. They strive for acceptance within their communities. Such acceptance should be granted through love for the individual while rejecting their misguided beliefs about gender and sexuality.
Examining Contemporary Gender Perspectives.
Historically, many religious texts, including the Bible, have conveyed the notion that God created two distinct genders—male and female—an idea encapsulated in Genesis 1:27, which has been interpreted to affirm a binary understanding of gender. However, contemporary discussions and research increasingly challenge this binary framework. They often propose that gender is not solely a biological or physiological attribute but can also be viewed as a social construct shaped by cultural, psychological, and individual experiences. This evolving perspective invites scrutiny in exploring gender identity.
Discussing Gender Identity and Influences.
Children today encounter mixed messages about gender; they learn that gender may not strictly relate to biological sex through various societal changes, such as gender-neutral days and curricula that discuss same-sex marriage. This can create confusion about their sexual identity. Some individuals claim to have felt aligned with the opposite gender from a young age, raising questions about their awareness of these feelings in the context of societal influences.
For example, psychotherapist and author Jonathan Alpert told Fox News Digital that the dramatic upward trend of gender dysphoria among young people in recent years should raise “serious questions about the role of cultural and social influences.”
“While increased awareness has made it easier for some children to express their struggles, we cannot ignore the possibility that social contagion, along with peer influence and social media—may be contributing to this surge,” he said.
Creation longs for freedom from sin’s consequences, as noted in Romans 8:20–22. Jesus Christ provides forgiveness and healing as the solution. Love is grounded in truth, according to 1 Corinthians 13:6, underscoring that God doesn’t make mistakes and that those grappling with identity can experience transformation through a relationship with Christ.
The Bottom Line
Some men say, “I identify as a woman; That is my right.” That is like a man who is only 5 feet 6 saying, “I want to be 6 feet 6; that is my right.”
The concept of biological sex is fundamentally rooted in genetics. Individuals who identify as male are consistently equipped with male chromosomes, while those who identify as female possess female chromosomes. This chromosomal makeup is established at conception and remains unchanged throughout a person’s life.
Regardless of an individual’s gender or feelings about that identity, the underlying genetic structure does not change. While personal expression and identity can lead to various forms of body modification—such as hormone therapies or surgical procedures—these changes are primarily cosmetic in nature. They can influence secondary sexual characteristics, such as body hair distribution or breast development, but they do not alter the chromosomal blueprint that defines one’s biological sex. Consequently, a person’s chromosomes from the moment of conception remain a steadfast aspect of their biology, external modifications notwithstanding.
This is consistent with biology and science. Biologists Colin Wright and Emma Hinton explain that scientifically, there are only two sexes, male and female, and there is no “sex spectrum.” They encourage medical professionals to stand up for the empirical reality of biological sex. (Colin M. Wright and Emma N. Hilton, “The Dangerous Denial of Sex,” The Wall Street Journal, February 13, 2020, https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-dangerous-denial-of-sex-115816 38089).
Creation is described in Romans 8:20–22 as yearning for liberation from the consequences of sin. The solution to this predicament is found in the redemptive work of Jesus Christ, who offers forgiveness and healing. According to 1 Corinthians 13:6, love should be rooted in truth. This perspective emphasizes that God does not make mistakes and suggests that those struggling with their identity may find transformation through a relationship with Christ.
Conclusion
It is essential to emphasize that God’s love extends to all people, as beautifully captured in the scripture: “For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.” (John 3:16 NIV). This profound message speaks to the universal nature of divine love while acknowledging that there may be differing interpretations of behavior in the context of faith. Ultimately, through love, empathy, and open conversation, we can bridge divides and build a supportive community where everyone feels valued and accepted. Loving the person does not mean also loving the actions and beliefs of that person. Jesus loves us despite all our faults. He cannot love us any more deeply than he already does.
Next post – Children – Part Two